Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Phi 4
Google's frontier model with a large leap in core reasoning.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Phi 4▼
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Phi 4?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (86.4 vs 64.6). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Phi 4?
▼
Phi 4 has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.1 Pro: $2.00 input / $12.00 output. Phi 4: $0.07 input / $0.14 output.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Phi 4?
▼
Gemini 3.1 Pro has a larger context window: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1M tokens vs Phi 4 at 16K tokens.
Do both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Phi 4 support vision?
▼
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports vision/image input, but Phi 4 does not.
What are the key differences between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Phi 4?
▼
Key differences: Gemini 3.1 Pro has a notably higher capability index (21.8 point gap); Phi 4 is significantly cheaper; only Gemini 3.1 Pro supports vision input; only Gemini 3.1 Pro offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.1 Pro and Phi 4 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.