Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsExploreResourcesPricing
Sign inUse for Free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Skills
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • About
  • Comparisons
  • Benchmarks
  • Model Match
  • Demos
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Migrate
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)Discord

Ling 3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)

At a glance

InclusionAI's fast hybrid-reasoning MoE, 560B total with 25B active.

262K ctx$0/$0 per M

The GA release of DeepSeek's open 1.6T-parameter MoE flagship for advanced reasoning and long-horizon agents.

1.0M ctx$0.66/$1.98 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
No benchmarks available

This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.

Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-10-02
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science91.7%Factual Recall52.9%
Math
Competition Math98.6%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning61.3%
Specs
262K
Context
33K
Max output
Oct 2026
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Aug 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0/M
Output$0/M
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.66/M tokens
Output$1.98/M tokens
Cache read$0.02/M tokens
Chat with Ling 3.1 FlashGo to model
Chat with DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Ling 3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)▼

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)?

▼

Both Ling 3.1 Flash and DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which has a larger context window, Ling 3.1 Flash or DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)?

▼

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) has a larger context window: Ling 3.1 Flash supports 262K tokens vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) at 1M tokens.

What are the key differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)?

▼

Ling 3.1 Flash and DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Ling 3.1 Flash and DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App