Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free

GPT 5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

At a glance
OpenAIGPT 5

OpenAI's powerful general-purpose frontier model.

82400K ctx$1.25/$10.00 per M#20/92
MoonshotAIKimi K2.7 Code

MoonshotAI's coding-focused Kimi model for end-to-end software engineering.

82262K ctx$0.74/$3.50 per M#20/92
AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
OpenAIGPT 5
Reasoning
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI81.8
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science86.2%Expert-Level25.3%Factual Recall50.6%
Math
Math Problems98.1%Competition Math91.4%Research Math32.4%
Coding
Real-World Coding73.6%Code Editing88.0%
Agentic
Terminal Tasks49.6%Novel Reasoning9.9%Task Horizon3.4h
MoonshotAIKimi K2.7 Code
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper
Capability
CapabilityECI81.8
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science89.5%Expert-Level—Factual Recall39.2%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math96.4%Research Math—
Coding
Real-World Coding—Code Editing—
Agentic
Terminal Tasks—Novel Reasoning—Task Horizon—
Specs
OpenAIGPT 5
400K
Context
128K
Max output
Aug 2025
Released
MoonshotAIKimi K2.7 Code
262K
Context
16K
Max output
Jun 2026
Released
Capabilities
OpenAIGPT 5
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
MoonshotAIKimi K2.7 Code
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
OpenAIGPT 5
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.25/M tokens
Output$10.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.13/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
MoonshotAIKimi K2.7 Code
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.74/M tokens
Output$3.50/M tokens
Cache read$0.15/M tokens
Chat with GPT 5Go to model
Chat with Kimi K2.7 CodeGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: GPT 5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code▼

Which is better, GPT 5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, GPT 5 scores higher (81.8 vs 81.8). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which is cheaper, GPT 5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

▼

Kimi K2.7 Code has a lower blended cost. GPT 5: $1.25 input / $10.00 output. Kimi K2.7 Code: $0.74 input / $3.50 output.

Which has a larger context window, GPT 5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

▼

GPT 5 has a larger context window: GPT 5 supports 400K tokens vs Kimi K2.7 Code at 262K tokens.

Do both GPT 5 and Kimi K2.7 Code support vision?

▼

Yes, both GPT 5 and Kimi K2.7 Code support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between GPT 5 and Kimi K2.7 Code?

▼

GPT 5 and Kimi K2.7 Code have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both GPT 5 and Kimi K2.7 Code for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Secrets
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Learn
  • Free tools
  • Prompts
  • Templates
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)