o3-mini (High) vs GLM 5.2
o3-mini with reasoning effort set to high for maximum STEM accuracy.
Z.ai's frontier reasoning model for long-context agents and software engineering.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: o3-mini (High) vs GLM 5.2▼
Which is better, o3-mini (High) or GLM 5.2?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, GLM 5.2 scores higher (83.4 vs 73.9). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, o3-mini (High) or GLM 5.2?
▼
o3-mini (High) has a lower blended cost. o3-mini (High): $1.10 input / $4.40 output. GLM 5.2: $1.40 input / $4.40 output.
Which has a larger context window, o3-mini (High) or GLM 5.2?
▼
GLM 5.2 has a larger context window: o3-mini (High) supports 200K tokens vs GLM 5.2 at 262K tokens.
What are the key differences between o3-mini (High) and GLM 5.2?
▼
Key differences: GLM 5.2 has a notably higher capability index (9.5 point gap). Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both o3-mini (High) and GLM 5.2 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.