o4-mini (High) vs GLM 5.2
o4-mini with reasoning effort locked to high for maximum accuracy.
Z.ai's frontier reasoning model for long-context agents and software engineering.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: o4-mini (High) vs GLM 5.2▼
Which is better, o4-mini (High) or GLM 5.2?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, GLM 5.2 scores higher (83.4 vs 78.6). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, o4-mini (High) or GLM 5.2?
▼
o4-mini (High) has a lower blended cost. o4-mini (High): $1.10 input / $4.40 output. GLM 5.2: $1.40 input / $4.40 output.
Which has a larger context window, o4-mini (High) or GLM 5.2?
▼
GLM 5.2 has a larger context window: o4-mini (High) supports 200K tokens vs GLM 5.2 at 262K tokens.
Do both o4-mini (High) and GLM 5.2 support vision?
▼
o4-mini (High) supports vision/image input, but GLM 5.2 does not.
What are the key differences between o4-mini (High) and GLM 5.2?
▼
Key differences: only o4-mini (High) supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both o4-mini (High) and GLM 5.2 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.