Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Qwen2.5 VL 72B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)

At a glance

Large 72B vision-language model from Qwen 2.5 generation.

63128K ctx$0.80/$1.00 per M#65/92

The GA release of DeepSeek's open 1.6T-parameter MoE flagship for advanced reasoning and long-horizon agents.

1.0M ctx$0.66/$1.98 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper14%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Specs
128K
Context
64K
Max output
Feb 2025
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Aug 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.80/M tokens
Output49%$1.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.40/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input18%$0.66/M tokens
Output$1.98/M tokens
Cache read95%$0.02/M tokens
Chat with Qwen2.5 VL 72BGo to model
Chat with DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen2.5 VL 72B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)▼

Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 72B or DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)?

▼

Both Qwen2.5 VL 72B and DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 VL 72B or DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)?

▼

Qwen2.5 VL 72B has a lower blended cost. Qwen2.5 VL 72B: $0.80 input / $1.00 output. DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813): $0.66 input / $1.98 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen2.5 VL 72B or DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)?

▼

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) has a larger context window: Qwen2.5 VL 72B supports 128K tokens vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen2.5 VL 72B and DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) support vision?

▼

Qwen2.5 VL 72B supports vision/image input, but DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen2.5 VL 72B and DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)?

▼

Key differences: only Qwen2.5 VL 72B supports vision input; only DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen2.5 VL 72B and DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App