Qwen3 235B A22B vs GLM 5.2
Qwen's flagship 235B MoE model with 22B active parameters.
Z.ai's frontier reasoning model for long-context agents and software engineering.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3 235B A22B vs GLM 5.2▼
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B or GLM 5.2?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, GLM 5.2 scores higher (83.4 vs 72.3). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B or GLM 5.2?
▼
Qwen3 235B A22B has a lower blended cost. Qwen3 235B A22B: $0.45 input / $1.82 output. GLM 5.2: $1.40 input / $4.40 output.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B or GLM 5.2?
▼
GLM 5.2 has a larger context window: Qwen3 235B A22B supports 131K tokens vs GLM 5.2 at 262K tokens.
What are the key differences between Qwen3 235B A22B and GLM 5.2?
▼
Key differences: GLM 5.2 has a notably higher capability index (11.1 point gap); Qwen3 235B A22B is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3 235B A22B and GLM 5.2 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.