GLM 5.2 vs Claude 3 Haiku
Z.ai's frontier reasoning model for long-context agents and software engineering.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: GLM 5.2 vs Claude 3 Haiku▼
Which is better, GLM 5.2 or Claude 3 Haiku?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, GLM 5.2 scores higher (83.4 vs 52.4). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or Claude 3 Haiku?
▼
Claude 3 Haiku has a lower blended cost. GLM 5.2: $1.40 input / $4.40 output. Claude 3 Haiku: $0.25 input / $1.25 output.
Which has a larger context window, GLM 5.2 or Claude 3 Haiku?
▼
GLM 5.2 has a larger context window: GLM 5.2 supports 262K tokens vs Claude 3 Haiku at 200K tokens.
Do both GLM 5.2 and Claude 3 Haiku support vision?
▼
Claude 3 Haiku supports vision/image input, but GLM 5.2 does not.
What are the key differences between GLM 5.2 and Claude 3 Haiku?
▼
Key differences: GLM 5.2 has a notably higher capability index (31.0 point gap); Claude 3 Haiku is significantly cheaper; only Claude 3 Haiku supports vision input; only GLM 5.2 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both GLM 5.2 and Claude 3 Haiku for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.