GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek R1 (0528)
Z.ai's frontier reasoning model for long-context agents and software engineering.
Updated DeepSeek R1 with performance on par with OpenAI o1.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek R1 (0528)▼
Which is better, GLM 5.2 or DeepSeek R1 (0528)?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, GLM 5.2 scores higher (83.4 vs 74.5). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or DeepSeek R1 (0528)?
▼
DeepSeek R1 (0528) has a lower blended cost. GLM 5.2: $1.40 input / $4.40 output. DeepSeek R1 (0528): $0.50 input / $2.15 output.
Which has a larger context window, GLM 5.2 or DeepSeek R1 (0528)?
▼
GLM 5.2 has a larger context window: GLM 5.2 supports 262K tokens vs DeepSeek R1 (0528) at 164K tokens.
What are the key differences between GLM 5.2 and DeepSeek R1 (0528)?
▼
Key differences: GLM 5.2 has a notably higher capability index (8.9 point gap); DeepSeek R1 (0528) is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both GLM 5.2 and DeepSeek R1 (0528) for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.