GLM 5.2 vs GPT Mini (120b)
Z.ai's frontier reasoning model for long-context agents and software engineering.
OpenAI's budget-friendly reasoning model — fast and surprisingly capable.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: GLM 5.2 vs GPT Mini (120b)▼
Which is better, GLM 5.2 or GPT Mini (120b)?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, GLM 5.2 scores higher (83.4 vs 73.2). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or GPT Mini (120b)?
▼
GPT Mini (120b) has a lower blended cost. GLM 5.2: $1.40 input / $4.40 output. GPT Mini (120b): $0.04 input / $0.18 output.
Which has a larger context window, GLM 5.2 or GPT Mini (120b)?
▼
GLM 5.2 has a larger context window: GLM 5.2 supports 262K tokens vs GPT Mini (120b) at 131K tokens.
What are the key differences between GLM 5.2 and GPT Mini (120b)?
▼
Key differences: GLM 5.2 has a notably higher capability index (10.2 point gap); GPT Mini (120b) is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both GLM 5.2 and GPT Mini (120b) for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.