Anthropic's Mythos-class flagship for ambitious, long-running professional work.
Updated DeepSeek R1 with performance on par with OpenAI o1.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Based on the Capability Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (91.6 vs 74.5). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
DeepSeek R1 (0528) has a lower blended cost. Claude Fable 5: $10.00 input / $50.00 output. DeepSeek R1 (0528): $0.50 input / $2.15 output.
Claude Fable 5 has a larger context window: Claude Fable 5 supports 1M tokens vs DeepSeek R1 (0528) at 164K tokens.
Claude Fable 5 supports vision/image input, but DeepSeek R1 (0528) does not.
Key differences: Claude Fable 5 has a notably higher capability index (17.1 point gap); DeepSeek R1 (0528) is significantly cheaper; only Claude Fable 5 supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Fable 5 and DeepSeek R1 (0528) for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.