Anthropic's Mythos-class flagship for ambitious, long-running professional work.
OpenAI's original omni model supporting text and image inputs.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Based on the Capability Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (91.6 vs 63.0). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
GPT 4o has a lower blended cost. Claude Fable 5: $10.00 input / $50.00 output. GPT 4o: $2.50 input / $10.00 output.
Claude Fable 5 has a larger context window: Claude Fable 5 supports 1M tokens vs GPT 4o at 128K tokens.
Yes, both Claude Fable 5 and GPT 4o support vision/image input.
Key differences: Claude Fable 5 has a notably higher capability index (28.6 point gap); GPT 4o is significantly cheaper; only Claude Fable 5 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Fable 5 and GPT 4o for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.