Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free

Claude Fable 5 vs o3

At a glance
AnthropicClaude Fable 5

Anthropic's Mythos-class flagship for ambitious, long-running professional work.

921M ctx$10.00/$50.00 per M#2/92
OpenAIo3

OpenAI's most powerful reasoning model — top across math, coding, and science.

79200K ctx$2.00/$8.00 per M#27/92
AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
AnthropicClaude Fable 5
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Smarter
Capability
CapabilityECI91.6
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—Expert-Level—Factual Recall68.3%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math99.7%Research Math—
Coding
Real-World Coding—Code Editing—
Agentic
Novel Reasoning—Task Horizon—
OpenAIo3
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper
Capability
CapabilityECI79.2
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science81.8%Expert-Level20.3%Factual Recall53.0%
Math
Math Problems97.8%Competition Math83.9%Research Math18.7%
Coding
Real-World Coding62.3%Code Editing81.3%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning6.5%Task Horizon1.5h
Specs
AnthropicClaude Fable 5
1M
Context
128K
Max output
Jun 2026
Released
OpenAIo3
200K
Context
100K
Max output
Apr 2025
Released
Capabilities
AnthropicClaude Fable 5
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
OpenAIo3
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
AnthropicClaude Fable 5
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$10.00/M tokens
Output$50.00/M tokens
Cache read$1.00/M tokens
Cache write$12.50/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
OpenAIo3
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$2.00/M tokens
Output$8.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.50/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Chat with Claude Fable 5Go to model
Chat with o3Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Fable 5 vs o3▼

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or o3?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, Claude Fable 5 scores higher (91.6 vs 79.2). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or o3?

▼

o3 has a lower blended cost. Claude Fable 5: $10.00 input / $50.00 output. o3: $2.00 input / $8.00 output.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or o3?

▼

Claude Fable 5 has a larger context window: Claude Fable 5 supports 1M tokens vs o3 at 200K tokens.

Do both Claude Fable 5 and o3 support vision?

▼

Yes, both Claude Fable 5 and o3 support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Claude Fable 5 and o3?

▼

Key differences: Claude Fable 5 has a notably higher capability index (12.4 point gap); o3 is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Fable 5 and o3 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Secrets
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Learn
  • Free tools
  • Prompts
  • Templates
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)