Fast and efficient with near-frontier intelligence.
Google's frontier model with a large leap in core reasoning.
No shared agent demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (86.4 vs 75.3). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output. Gemini 3.1 Pro: $2.00 input / $12.00 output.
Gemini 3.1 Pro has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at 1M tokens.
Yes, both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro support vision/image input.
Key differences: Gemini 3.1 Pro has a notably higher capability index (11.1 point gap). Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.