Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Phi 4
Fast and efficient with near-frontier intelligence.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Phi 4▼
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Phi 4?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher (75.3 vs 64.6). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Phi 4?
▼
Phi 4 has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output. Phi 4: $0.07 input / $0.14 output.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Phi 4?
▼
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens vs Phi 4 at 16K tokens.
Do both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Phi 4 support vision?
▼
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports vision/image input, but Phi 4 does not.
What are the key differences between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Phi 4?
▼
Key differences: Claude Haiku 4.5 has a notably higher capability index (10.7 point gap); Phi 4 is significantly cheaper; only Claude Haiku 4.5 supports vision input; only Claude Haiku 4.5 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Phi 4 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.