Fast and efficient with near-frontier intelligence.
OpenAI's most advanced agentic coding model with 400K context.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Based on the Capability Index, GPT 5.3 Codex scores higher (87.0 vs 75.3). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output. GPT 5.3 Codex: $1.75 input / $14.00 output.
GPT 5.3 Codex has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens vs GPT 5.3 Codex at 400K tokens.
Yes, both Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT 5.3 Codex support vision/image input.
Key differences: GPT 5.3 Codex has a notably higher capability index (11.7 point gap). Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT 5.3 Codex for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.