Fast and efficient with near-frontier intelligence.
Qwen's flagship 235B MoE model with 22B active parameters.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Based on the Capability Index, Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher (75.3 vs 72.3). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Qwen3 235B A22B has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output. Qwen3 235B A22B: $0.45 input / $1.82 output.
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens vs Qwen3 235B A22B at 131K tokens.
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 235B A22B does not.
Key differences: Qwen3 235B A22B is significantly cheaper; only Claude Haiku 4.5 supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 235B A22B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.