Fast and efficient with near-frontier intelligence.
StepFun's efficient multimodal MoE model for high-throughput analysis and agents.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Step 3.7 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Step 3.7 Flash has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output. Step 3.7 Flash: $0.20 input / $1.15 output.
Step 3.7 Flash has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens vs Step 3.7 Flash at 256K tokens.
Yes, both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Step 3.7 Flash support vision/image input.
Key differences: Step 3.7 Flash is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Step 3.7 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.