Fast and efficient with near-frontier intelligence.
GLM 4.5 with vision capabilities for multimodal understanding.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.5V are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
GLM 4.5V has a lower blended cost. Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output. GLM 4.5V: $0.60 input / $1.80 output.
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a larger context window: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens vs GLM 4.5V at 66K tokens.
Yes, both Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.5V support vision/image input.
Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.5V have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.5V for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.