Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Secrets
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Learn
  • Prompts
  • Templates
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

At a glance

Anthropic's next-generation Opus, built for long-running, asynchronous agents.

871M ctx$5.00/$25.00 per M#7/92

Google's high-efficiency model for coding, agentic workflows, and web and app development.

1.0M ctx$1.50/$7.50 per M
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI87.4
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science90.2%Factual Recall50.6%
Math
Competition Math97.8%Research Math43.8%
Coding
Real-World Coding83.5%
Agentic
Terminal Tasks—Novel Reasoning75.8%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Provider·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-21
Cheaper70%
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—Factual Recall—
Math
Competition Math—Research Math—
Coding
Real-World Coding—
Agentic
Terminal Tasks78.0%Novel Reasoning—
Specs
1M
Context
128K
Max output
Apr 2026
Released
1.0M
Context
66K
Max output
Jul 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$5.00/M tokens
Output$25.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.50/M tokens
Cache write$6.25/M tokens
Web search29%$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input70%$1.50/M tokens
Output70%$7.50/M tokens
Reasoning$7.50/M tokens
Cache read70%$0.15/M tokens
Cache write99%$0.08/M tokens
Image input$1.50/M tokens
Audio input$1.50/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Chat with Claude Opus 4.7Go to model
Chat with Gemini 3.6 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash▼

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

▼

Both Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.6 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

▼

Gemini 3.6 Flash has a lower blended cost. Claude Opus 4.7: $5.00 input / $25.00 output. Gemini 3.6 Flash: $1.50 input / $7.50 output.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

▼

Gemini 3.6 Flash has a larger context window: Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1M tokens vs Gemini 3.6 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.6 Flash support vision?

▼

Yes, both Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.6 Flash support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.6 Flash?

▼

Key differences: Gemini 3.6 Flash is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.6 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App