Claude Opus 4.8 vs o3-mini (High)
Anthropic's most capable Opus yet, built for long-horizon autonomous agents and frontier coding.
o3-mini with reasoning effort set to high for maximum STEM accuracy.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Opus 4.8 vs o3-mini (High)▼
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.8 or o3-mini (High)?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher (89.2 vs 73.9). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or o3-mini (High)?
▼
o3-mini (High) has a lower blended cost. Claude Opus 4.8: $5.00 input / $25.00 output. o3-mini (High): $1.10 input / $4.40 output.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or o3-mini (High)?
▼
Claude Opus 4.8 has a larger context window: Claude Opus 4.8 supports 1M tokens vs o3-mini (High) at 200K tokens.
Do both Claude Opus 4.8 and o3-mini (High) support vision?
▼
Claude Opus 4.8 supports vision/image input, but o3-mini (High) does not.
What are the key differences between Claude Opus 4.8 and o3-mini (High)?
▼
Key differences: Claude Opus 4.8 has a notably higher capability index (15.3 point gap); o3-mini (High) is significantly cheaper; only Claude Opus 4.8 supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Opus 4.8 and o3-mini (High) for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.