Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free trial
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B

At a glance

Anthropic's most capable Opus yet, built for long-horizon autonomous agents and frontier coding.

891M ctx$5.00/$25.00 per M#4/92

Second-generation Qwen coding model at 32B scale.

5433K ctx$0.66/$1.00 per M#74/92
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·Provider·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Smarter66%
Capability
CapabilityECI66%89.2
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science91.0%Factual Recall39.5%
Math
Competition Math98.3%Research Math47.2%
Coding
Real-World Coding88.6%Code Editing—
Agentic
Novel Reasoning72.1%
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper93%
Capability
CapabilityECI53.8
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—Factual Recall—
Math
Competition Math—Research Math—
Coding
Real-World Coding—Code Editing16.4%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning—
Specs
1M
Context
128K
Max output
May 2026
Released
33K
Context
16K
Max output
Nov 2024
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$5.00/M tokens
Output$25.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.50/M tokens
Cache write$6.25/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input87%$0.66/M tokens
Output96%$1.00/M tokens
Chat with Claude Opus 4.8Go to model
Chat with Qwen2.5 Coder 32BGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B▼

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.8 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher (89.2 vs 53.8). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B?

▼

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B has a lower blended cost. Claude Opus 4.8: $5.00 input / $25.00 output. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B: $0.66 input / $1.00 output.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B?

▼

Claude Opus 4.8 has a larger context window: Claude Opus 4.8 supports 1M tokens vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B at 33K tokens.

Do both Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B support vision?

▼

Claude Opus 4.8 supports vision/image input, but Qwen2.5 Coder 32B does not.

What are the key differences between Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B?

▼

Key differences: Claude Opus 4.8 has a notably higher capability index (35.4 point gap); Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is significantly cheaper; only Claude Opus 4.8 supports vision input; only Claude Opus 4.8 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App