Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

At a glance

Anthropic's flagship for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work.

1M ctx$5.00/$25.00 per M

Next-generation 80B MoE model with always-on reasoning mode.

131K ctx$0.10/$0.78 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper97%
Specs
1M
Context
128K
Max output
Jul 2026
Released
131K
Context
33K
Max output
Sep 2025
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$5.00/M tokens
Output$25.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.50/M tokens
Cache write$6.25/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input98%$0.10/M tokens
Output97%$0.78/M tokens
Chat with Claude Opus 5Go to model
Chat with Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking▼

Which is better, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

▼

Both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

▼

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has a lower blended cost. Claude Opus 5: $5.00 input / $25.00 output. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: $0.10 input / $0.78 output.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

▼

Claude Opus 5 has a larger context window: Claude Opus 5 supports 1M tokens vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking at 131K tokens.

Do both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking support vision?

▼

Claude Opus 5 supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking does not.

What are the key differences between Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

▼

Key differences: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is significantly cheaper; only Claude Opus 5 supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App