Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

At a glance

Anthropic's flagship for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work.

1M ctx$5.00/$25.00 per M

The open-weight variant of Qwen3.8 Max, with 95 billion active parameters out of 2.4 trillion total.

1M ctx$2.00/$6.00 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper70%
Specs
1M
Context
128K
Max output
Jul 2026
Released
1M
Context
131K
Max output
Aug 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$5.00/M tokens
Output$25.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.50/M tokens
Cache write$6.25/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input60%$2.00/M tokens
Output76%$6.00/M tokens
Cache read50%$0.25/M tokens
Chat with Claude Opus 5Go to model
Chat with Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B▼

Which is better, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

▼

Both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

▼

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has a lower blended cost. Claude Opus 5: $5.00 input / $25.00 output. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: $2.00 input / $6.00 output.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

▼

Claude Opus 5 has a larger context window: Claude Opus 5 supports 1M tokens vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at 1M tokens.

Do both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B support vision?

▼

Claude Opus 5 supports vision/image input, but Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B does not.

What are the key differences between Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

▼

Key differences: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is significantly cheaper; only Claude Opus 5 supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App