Experimental DeepSeek V3.2 variant with DeepSeek Sparse Attention.
Google's high-speed thinking model for agentic workflows, chat, and coding.
No shared agent demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher (86.2 vs 77.2). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has a lower blended cost. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: $0.27 input / $0.41 output. Gemini 3.5 Flash: $1.50 input / $9.00 output.
Gemini 3.5 Flash has a larger context window: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp supports 164K tokens vs Gemini 3.5 Flash at 1M tokens.
Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision/image input, but DeepSeek V3.2 Exp does not.
Key differences: Gemini 3.5 Flash has a notably higher capability index (9.0 point gap); DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is significantly cheaper; only Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.