Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
Google's high-speed thinking model for agentic workflows, chat, and coding.
Fast and accurate with enhanced coding and tool use capabilities.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude 3.5 Haiku▼
Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Claude 3.5 Haiku?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher (86.2 vs 61.4). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Claude 3.5 Haiku?
▼
Claude 3.5 Haiku has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.5 Flash: $1.50 input / $9.00 output. Claude 3.5 Haiku: $0.80 input / $4.00 output.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Claude 3.5 Haiku?
▼
Gemini 3.5 Flash has a larger context window: Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1M tokens vs Claude 3.5 Haiku at 200K tokens.
Do both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude 3.5 Haiku support vision?
▼
Yes, both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude 3.5 Haiku support vision/image input.
What are the key differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude 3.5 Haiku?
▼
Key differences: Gemini 3.5 Flash has a notably higher capability index (24.8 point gap); only Gemini 3.5 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude 3.5 Haiku for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.