Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free trial
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude 3.5 Haiku

At a glance

Google's high-speed thinking model for agentic workflows, chat, and coding.

861.0M ctx$1.50/$9.00 per M#11/92

Fast and accurate with enhanced coding and tool use capabilities.

61200K ctx$0.80/$4.00 per M#68/92
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Smarter40%
Capability
CapabilityECI40%86.2
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science143%92.8%Factual Recall921%68.4%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math2119%95.6%Research Math11200%39.0%
Coding
Real-World Coding79.3%Code Editing—
Agentic
Novel Reasoning72.1%
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper53%
Capability
CapabilityECI61.4
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science38.1%Factual Recall6.7%
Math
Math Problems46.4%Competition Math4.3%Research Math0.3%
Coding
Real-World Coding—Code Editing28.0%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning—
Specs
1.0M
Context
66K
Max output
May 2026
Released
200K
Context
8K
Max output
Nov 2024
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.50/M tokens
Output$9.00/M tokens
Reasoning$9.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.15/M tokens
Cache write92%$0.08/M tokens
Image input$1.50/M tokens
Audio input$3.00/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input47%$0.80/M tokens
Output56%$4.00/M tokens
Cache read47%$0.08/M tokens
Cache write$1.00/M tokens
Web search29%$0.01/search
Chat with Gemini 3.5 FlashGo to model
Chat with Claude 3.5 HaikuGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude 3.5 Haiku▼

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Claude 3.5 Haiku?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher (86.2 vs 61.4). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Claude 3.5 Haiku?

▼

Claude 3.5 Haiku has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.5 Flash: $1.50 input / $9.00 output. Claude 3.5 Haiku: $0.80 input / $4.00 output.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Claude 3.5 Haiku?

▼

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a larger context window: Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1M tokens vs Claude 3.5 Haiku at 200K tokens.

Do both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude 3.5 Haiku support vision?

▼

Yes, both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude 3.5 Haiku support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude 3.5 Haiku?

▼

Key differences: Gemini 3.5 Flash has a notably higher capability index (24.8 point gap); only Gemini 3.5 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude 3.5 Haiku for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App