Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Opus 4
Google's high-speed thinking model for agentic workflows, chat, and coding.
World-class coding model with sustained performance on complex agentic tasks.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Opus 4▼
Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Claude Opus 4?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher (86.2 vs 75.4). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Claude Opus 4?
▼
Gemini 3.5 Flash has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.5 Flash: $1.50 input / $9.00 output. Claude Opus 4: $15.00 input / $75.00 output.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Claude Opus 4?
▼
Gemini 3.5 Flash has a larger context window: Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1M tokens vs Claude Opus 4 at 200K tokens.
Do both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude Opus 4 support vision?
▼
Yes, both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude Opus 4 support vision/image input.
Which has better coding performance, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Claude Opus 4?
▼
Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on SWE-bench Verified: Gemini 3.5 Flash resolves 79% vs Claude Opus 4 at 71%.
What are the key differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude Opus 4?
▼
Key differences: Gemini 3.5 Flash has a notably higher capability index (10.8 point gap); Gemini 3.5 Flash is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude Opus 4 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.