Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free trial
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B

At a glance

Google's high-speed thinking model for agentic workflows, chat, and coding.

861.0M ctx$1.50/$9.00 per M#11/92

Meta's efficient 70B model matching Llama 3.1 405B on key benchmarks.

61131K ctx$0.13/$0.40 per M#68/92
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Smarter40%
Capability
CapabilityECI40%86.2
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science96%92.8%Factual Recall68.4%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math1759%95.6%Research Math39.0%
Coding
Real-World Coding79.3%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning72.1%
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper94%
Capability
CapabilityECI61.4
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science47.4%Factual Recall—
Math
Math Problems41.6%Competition Math5.1%Research Math—
Coding
Real-World Coding—
Agentic
Novel Reasoning—
Specs
1.0M
Context
66K
Max output
May 2026
Released
131K
Context
66K
Max output
Dec 2024
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.50/M tokens
Output$9.00/M tokens
Reasoning$9.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.15/M tokens
Cache write$0.08/M tokens
Image input$1.50/M tokens
Audio input$3.00/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input91%$0.13/M tokens
Output96%$0.40/M tokens
Chat with Gemini 3.5 FlashGo to model
Chat with Llama 3.3 70BGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B▼

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher (86.2 vs 61.4). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B?

▼

Llama 3.3 70B has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.5 Flash: $1.50 input / $9.00 output. Llama 3.3 70B: $0.13 input / $0.40 output.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Llama 3.3 70B?

▼

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a larger context window: Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1M tokens vs Llama 3.3 70B at 131K tokens.

Do both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Llama 3.3 70B support vision?

▼

Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision/image input, but Llama 3.3 70B does not.

What are the key differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash and Llama 3.3 70B?

▼

Key differences: Gemini 3.5 Flash has a notably higher capability index (24.8 point gap); Llama 3.3 70B is significantly cheaper; only Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision input; only Gemini 3.5 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Llama 3.3 70B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App