Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free trial
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen Plus

At a glance

Google's high-speed thinking model for agentic workflows, chat, and coding.

861.0M ctx$1.50/$9.00 per M#11/92

Qwen's mid-tier commercial model for balanced performance.

631M ctx$0.26/$0.78 per M#63/92
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Smarter37%
Capability
CapabilityECI37%86.2
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science93%92.8%Factual Recall68.4%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math438%95.6%Research Math2160%39.0%
Coding
Real-World Coding79.3%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning72.1%
CI 62.8-64.3
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper88%
Capability
CapabilityECI63.1
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science48.1%Factual Recall—
Math
Math Problems65.3%Competition Math17.8%Research Math1.7%
Coding
Real-World Coding—
Agentic
Novel Reasoning—
Specs
1.0M
Context
66K
Max output
May 2026
Released
1M
Context
33K
Max output
Feb 2025
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.50/M tokens
Output$9.00/M tokens
Reasoning$9.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.15/M tokens
Cache write74%$0.08/M tokens
Image input$1.50/M tokens
Audio input$3.00/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input83%$0.26/M tokens
Output91%$0.78/M tokens
Cache read65%$0.05/M tokens
Cache write$0.33/M tokens
Chat with Gemini 3.5 FlashGo to model
Chat with Qwen PlusGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen Plus▼

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen Plus?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher (86.2 vs 63.1). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen Plus?

▼

Qwen Plus has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.5 Flash: $1.50 input / $9.00 output. Qwen Plus: $0.26 input / $0.78 output.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen Plus?

▼

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a larger context window: Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1M tokens vs Qwen Plus at 1M tokens.

Do both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen Plus support vision?

▼

Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen Plus does not.

What are the key differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen Plus?

▼

Key differences: Gemini 3.5 Flash has a notably higher capability index (23.1 point gap); Qwen Plus is significantly cheaper; only Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision input; only Gemini 3.5 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen Plus for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App