Google's high-speed thinking model for agentic workflows, chat, and coding.
July 2025 update to Qwen3 235B A22B with improved capabilities.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3 235B A22B (2507) are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Qwen3 235B A22B (2507) has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.5 Flash: $1.50 input / $9.00 output. Qwen3 235B A22B (2507): $0.09 input / $0.55 output.
Gemini 3.5 Flash has a larger context window: Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1M tokens vs Qwen3 235B A22B (2507) at 262K tokens.
Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 235B A22B (2507) does not.
Key differences: Qwen3 235B A22B (2507) is significantly cheaper; only Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision input; only Gemini 3.5 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3 235B A22B (2507) for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.