Google's high-speed thinking model for agentic workflows, chat, and coding.
Flagship reasoning model for complex multi-step tasks.
No shared agent demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher (86.2 vs 76.5). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Qwen3 Max Thinking has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.5 Flash: $1.50 input / $9.00 output. Qwen3 Max Thinking: $0.78 input / $3.90 output.
Gemini 3.5 Flash has a larger context window: Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1M tokens vs Qwen3 Max Thinking at 262K tokens.
Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Max Thinking does not.
Key differences: Gemini 3.5 Flash has a notably higher capability index (9.7 point gap); only Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3 Max Thinking for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.