Google's high-speed thinking model for agentic workflows, chat, and coding.
Next-generation 80B MoE model with always-on reasoning mode.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.5 Flash: $1.50 input / $9.00 output. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: $0.10 input / $0.78 output.
Gemini 3.5 Flash has a larger context window: Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1M tokens vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking at 131K tokens.
Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking does not.
Key differences: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is significantly cheaper; only Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.