Google's high-efficiency model for coding, agentic workflows, and web and app development.
Optimized for software engineering and coding workflows.
No shared agent demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT 5.2 Codex are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Gemini 3.6 Flash has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.6 Flash: $1.50 input / $7.50 output. GPT 5.2 Codex: $1.75 input / $14.00 output.
Gemini 3.6 Flash has a larger context window: Gemini 3.6 Flash supports 1M tokens vs GPT 5.2 Codex at 400K tokens.
Yes, both Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT 5.2 Codex support vision/image input.
Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT 5.2 Codex have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT 5.2 Codex for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.