Google's high-efficiency model for coding, agentic workflows, and web and app development.
Large 72B model from the Qwen 2.5 generation.
No shared agent demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen2.5 72B are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Qwen2.5 72B has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.6 Flash: $1.50 input / $7.50 output. Qwen2.5 72B: $0.36 input / $0.40 output.
Gemini 3.6 Flash has a larger context window: Gemini 3.6 Flash supports 1M tokens vs Qwen2.5 72B at 33K tokens.
Gemini 3.6 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen2.5 72B does not.
Key differences: Qwen2.5 72B is significantly cheaper; only Gemini 3.6 Flash supports vision input; only Gemini 3.6 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen2.5 72B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.