Inception's latest diffusion LLM and the fastest reasoning model available, producing and refining tokens in parallel instead of one at a time.
Efficient coding agent with 80B parameters, only 3B active per token.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Mercury 2.5 and Qwen3 Coder Next are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Mercury 2.5 has a lower blended cost. Mercury 2.5: $0.04 input / $0.15 output. Qwen3 Coder Next: $0.11 input / $0.80 output.
Qwen3 Coder Next has a larger context window: Mercury 2.5 supports 260K tokens vs Qwen3 Coder Next at 262K tokens.
Key differences: Mercury 2.5 is significantly cheaper; only Mercury 2.5 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Mercury 2.5 and Qwen3 Coder Next for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.