Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free trial
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Phi 4 Reasoning vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

At a glance

Microsoft's 14B open reasoning model that rivals much larger models.

33K ctx

Google's high-efficiency model for coding, agentic workflows, and web and app development.

1.0M ctx$1.50/$7.50 per M
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
No benchmarks available

This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.

Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Provider·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-21
Agentic
Terminal Tasks78.0%
Specs
33K
Context
8K
Max output
—
Released
1.0M
Context
66K
Max output
Jul 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Pricing not available
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.50/M tokens
Output$7.50/M tokens
Reasoning$7.50/M tokens
Cache read$0.15/M tokens
Cache write$0.08/M tokens
Image input$1.50/M tokens
Audio input$1.50/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Chat with Phi 4 ReasoningGo to model
Chat with Gemini 3.6 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Phi 4 Reasoning vs Gemini 3.6 Flash▼

Which is better, Phi 4 Reasoning or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

▼

Both Phi 4 Reasoning and Gemini 3.6 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which has a larger context window, Phi 4 Reasoning or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

▼

Gemini 3.6 Flash has a larger context window: Phi 4 Reasoning supports 33K tokens vs Gemini 3.6 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Phi 4 Reasoning and Gemini 3.6 Flash support vision?

▼

Gemini 3.6 Flash supports vision/image input, but Phi 4 Reasoning does not.

What are the key differences between Phi 4 Reasoning and Gemini 3.6 Flash?

▼

Key differences: only Gemini 3.6 Flash supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Phi 4 Reasoning and Gemini 3.6 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App