Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Mistral Nemo vs Muse Spark 1.3

At a glance

12B model from Mistral and NVIDIA — efficient and multilingual.

131K ctx$0.02/$0.03 per M

Meta's latest multimodal reasoning model for long-running agentic, multi-agent, and coding workflows.

1.0M ctx$1.25/$4.25 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper99%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Specs
131K
Context
16K
Max output
Jul 2024
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Sep 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input98%$0.02/M tokens
Output99%$0.03/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.25/M tokens
Output$4.25/M tokens
Cache read$0.15/M tokens
Web search$0.003/search
Chat with Mistral NemoGo to model
Chat with Muse Spark 1.3Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Mistral Nemo vs Muse Spark 1.3▼

Which is better, Mistral Nemo or Muse Spark 1.3?

▼

Both Mistral Nemo and Muse Spark 1.3 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Muse Spark 1.3?

▼

Mistral Nemo has a lower blended cost. Mistral Nemo: $0.02 input / $0.03 output. Muse Spark 1.3: $1.25 input / $4.25 output.

Which has a larger context window, Mistral Nemo or Muse Spark 1.3?

▼

Muse Spark 1.3 has a larger context window: Mistral Nemo supports 131K tokens vs Muse Spark 1.3 at 1M tokens.

Do both Mistral Nemo and Muse Spark 1.3 support vision?

▼

Muse Spark 1.3 supports vision/image input, but Mistral Nemo does not.

What are the key differences between Mistral Nemo and Muse Spark 1.3?

▼

Key differences: Mistral Nemo is significantly cheaper; only Muse Spark 1.3 supports vision input; only Muse Spark 1.3 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Mistral Nemo and Muse Spark 1.3 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App