Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Kimi K2.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

At a glance

MoonshotAI's next-generation multimodal model built for long-horizon coding and multi-agent orchestration.

83262K ctx$0.68/$3.42 per M#17/92

Google's high-speed thinking model for agentic workflows, chat, and coding.

861.0M ctx$1.50/$9.00 per M#11/92
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper59%
Capability
CapabilityECI82.9
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science90.8%Factual Recall38.7%
Math
Competition Math1%96.1%Research Math39.0%
Coding
Real-World Coding76.7%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning—
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Smarter4%
Capability
CapabilityECI4%86.2
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science2%92.8%Factual Recall77%68.4%
Math
Competition Math95.6%Research Math39.0%
Coding
Real-World Coding4%79.3%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning72.1%
Specs
262K
Context
128K
Max output
Apr 2026
Released
1.0M
Context
66K
Max output
May 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input54%$0.68/M tokens
Output62%$3.42/M tokens
Cache read4%$0.14/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.50/M tokens
Output$9.00/M tokens
Reasoning$9.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.15/M tokens
Cache write$0.08/M tokens
Image input$1.50/M tokens
Audio input$3.00/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Chat with Kimi K2.6Go to model
Chat with Gemini 3.5 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Kimi K2.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash▼

Which is better, Kimi K2.6 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher (86.2 vs 82.9). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

▼

Kimi K2.6 has a lower blended cost. Kimi K2.6: $0.68 input / $3.42 output. Gemini 3.5 Flash: $1.50 input / $9.00 output.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2.6 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

▼

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a larger context window: Kimi K2.6 supports 262K tokens vs Gemini 3.5 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Kimi K2.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash support vision?

▼

Yes, both Kimi K2.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash support vision/image input.

Which has better coding performance, Kimi K2.6 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

▼

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on SWE-bench Verified: Kimi K2.6 resolves 77% vs Gemini 3.5 Flash at 79%.

What are the key differences between Kimi K2.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash?

▼

Key differences: Kimi K2.6 is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Kimi K2.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App