Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free

GPT 5.6 Luna vs Claude Sonnet 4

At a glance
OpenAIGPT 5.6 Luna

OpenAI's fastest, most affordable GPT-5.6 tier for high-volume, latency-sensitive work.

1.1M ctx$1.00/$6.00 per M
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4

Significantly enhanced over Sonnet 3.7 in coding and reasoning tasks.

751M ctx$3.00/$15.00 per M#43/92
AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
OpenAIGPT 5.6 Luna
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Provider·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-11
Cheaper
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science92.3%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math—Research Math—
Coding
Code Editing—
Agentic
Terminal Tasks84.7%Novel Reasoning—
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI74.7
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science66.7%
Math
Math Problems84.4%Competition Math28.9%Research Math4.1%
Coding
Code Editing56.4%
Agentic
Terminal Tasks—Novel Reasoning1.3%
Specs
OpenAIGPT 5.6 Luna
1.1M
Context
128K
Max output
Jul 2026
Released
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4
1M
Context
64K
Max output
May 2025
Released
Capabilities
OpenAIGPT 5.6 Luna
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
OpenAIGPT 5.6 Luna
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.00/M tokens
Output$6.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.10/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$3.00/M tokens
Output$15.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.30/M tokens
Cache write$3.75/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Chat with GPT 5.6 LunaGo to model
Chat with Claude Sonnet 4Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: GPT 5.6 Luna vs Claude Sonnet 4▼

Which is better, GPT 5.6 Luna or Claude Sonnet 4?

▼

Both GPT 5.6 Luna and Claude Sonnet 4 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, GPT 5.6 Luna or Claude Sonnet 4?

▼

GPT 5.6 Luna has a lower blended cost. GPT 5.6 Luna: $1.00 input / $6.00 output. Claude Sonnet 4: $3.00 input / $15.00 output.

Which has a larger context window, GPT 5.6 Luna or Claude Sonnet 4?

▼

GPT 5.6 Luna has a larger context window: GPT 5.6 Luna supports 1.1M tokens vs Claude Sonnet 4 at 1M tokens.

Do both GPT 5.6 Luna and Claude Sonnet 4 support vision?

▼

Yes, both GPT 5.6 Luna and Claude Sonnet 4 support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between GPT 5.6 Luna and Claude Sonnet 4?

▼

Key differences: GPT 5.6 Luna is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both GPT 5.6 Luna and Claude Sonnet 4 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Secrets
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Learn
  • Free tools
  • Prompts
  • Templates
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)