Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Qwen Max vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

At a glance

Qwen's top commercial model for the most demanding tasks.

6733K ctx#60/92

Google's high-speed thinking model for agentic workflows, chat, and coding.

861.0M ctx$1.50/$9.00 per M#11/92
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI66.7
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science56.1%Factual Recall—
Math
Math Problems67.2%Competition Math16.1%Research Math1.0%
Coding
Real-World Coding—Code Editing21.8%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning—
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Smarter29%
Capability
CapabilityECI29%86.2
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science65%92.8%Factual Recall68.4%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math493%95.6%Research Math3667%39.0%
Coding
Real-World Coding79.3%Code Editing—
Agentic
Novel Reasoning72.1%
Specs
33K
Context
8K
Max output
—
Released
1.0M
Context
66K
Max output
May 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Pricing not available
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.50/M tokens
Output$9.00/M tokens
Reasoning$9.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.15/M tokens
Cache write$0.08/M tokens
Image input$1.50/M tokens
Audio input$3.00/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Chat with Qwen MaxGo to model
Chat with Gemini 3.5 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen Max vs Gemini 3.5 Flash▼

Which is better, Qwen Max or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher (86.2 vs 66.7). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen Max or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

▼

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a larger context window: Qwen Max supports 33K tokens vs Gemini 3.5 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen Max and Gemini 3.5 Flash support vision?

▼

Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen Max does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen Max and Gemini 3.5 Flash?

▼

Key differences: Gemini 3.5 Flash has a notably higher capability index (19.5 point gap); only Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision input; only Gemini 3.5 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen Max and Gemini 3.5 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App