Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Qwen Turbo vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

At a glance

Fast and cost-efficient Qwen model for high-throughput applications.

611M ctx#70/92

Google's high-speed thinking model for agentic workflows, chat, and coding.

861.0M ctx$1.50/$9.00 per M#11/92
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CI 58.1-62.4
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI60.7
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science41.8%Factual Recall—
Math
Math Problems56.2%Competition Math6.1%Research Math—
Coding
Real-World Coding—
Agentic
Novel Reasoning—
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Smarter42%
Capability
CapabilityECI42%86.2
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science122%92.8%Factual Recall68.4%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math1464%95.6%Research Math39.0%
Coding
Real-World Coding79.3%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning72.1%
Specs
1M
Context
8K
Max output
—
Released
1.0M
Context
66K
Max output
May 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Pricing not available
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.50/M tokens
Output$9.00/M tokens
Reasoning$9.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.15/M tokens
Cache write$0.08/M tokens
Image input$1.50/M tokens
Audio input$3.00/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Chat with Qwen TurboGo to model
Chat with Gemini 3.5 FlashGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen Turbo vs Gemini 3.5 Flash▼

Which is better, Qwen Turbo or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher (86.2 vs 60.7). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen Turbo or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

▼

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a larger context window: Qwen Turbo supports 1M tokens vs Gemini 3.5 Flash at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen Turbo and Gemini 3.5 Flash support vision?

▼

Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision/image input, but Qwen Turbo does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen Turbo and Gemini 3.5 Flash?

▼

Key differences: Gemini 3.5 Flash has a notably higher capability index (25.5 point gap); only Gemini 3.5 Flash supports vision input; only Gemini 3.5 Flash offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen Turbo and Gemini 3.5 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App