Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Opus 5

At a glance

Next-generation 80B MoE model with always-on reasoning mode.

131K ctx$0.10/$0.78 per M

Anthropic's flagship for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work.

1M ctx$5.00/$25.00 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper97%
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Specs
131K
Context
33K
Max output
Sep 2025
Released
1M
Context
128K
Max output
Jul 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input98%$0.10/M tokens
Output97%$0.78/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$5.00/M tokens
Output$25.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.50/M tokens
Cache write$6.25/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Chat with Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingGo to model
Chat with Claude Opus 5Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Opus 5▼

Which is better, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Claude Opus 5?

▼

Both Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Claude Opus 5 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Claude Opus 5?

▼

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has a lower blended cost. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: $0.10 input / $0.78 output. Claude Opus 5: $5.00 input / $25.00 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Claude Opus 5?

▼

Claude Opus 5 has a larger context window: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens vs Claude Opus 5 at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Claude Opus 5 support vision?

▼

Claude Opus 5 supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Claude Opus 5?

▼

Key differences: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is significantly cheaper; only Claude Opus 5 supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Claude Opus 5 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App