Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free trial
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Agents
  • Computers
  • Drive
  • Automations
  • AI Gateway
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Benchmarks
  • Demos
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

At a glance

Qwen's largest vision-language model with 235B MoE architecture.

131K ctx$0.21/$1.90 per M

Next-generation 80B MoE model with always-on reasoning mode.

131K ctx$0.10/$0.78 per M
Demos
All demos

No shared demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:OpenRouter
Cheaper58%
Specs
131K
Context
33K
Max output
Sep 2025
Released
131K
Context
33K
Max output
Sep 2025
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.21/M tokens
Output$1.90/M tokens
Cache read$0.10/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input54%$0.10/M tokens
Output59%$0.78/M tokens
Chat with Qwen3 VL 235B A22BGo to model
Chat with Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking▼

Which is better, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

▼

Both Qwen3 VL 235B A22B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

▼

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has a lower blended cost. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B: $0.21 input / $1.90 output. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: $0.10 input / $0.78 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

▼

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B has a larger context window: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B supports 131K tokens vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking at 131K tokens.

Do both Qwen3 VL 235B A22B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking support vision?

▼

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking does not.

What are the key differences between Qwen3 VL 235B A22B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

▼

Key differences: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is significantly cheaper; only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B supports vision input; only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3 VL 235B A22B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App