Qwen3 VL 235B A22B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen's largest vision-language model with 235B MoE architecture.
Next-generation 80B MoE model with always-on reasoning mode.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.
This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking▼
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
▼
Both Qwen3 VL 235B A22B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
▼
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has a lower blended cost. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B: $0.20 input / $0.88 output. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: $0.10 input / $0.78 output.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
▼
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B has a larger context window: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B supports 262K tokens vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking at 131K tokens.
Do both Qwen3 VL 235B A22B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking support vision?
▼
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B supports vision/image input, but Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking does not.
What are the key differences between Qwen3 VL 235B A22B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
▼
Key differences: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is significantly cheaper; only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B supports vision input; only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3 VL 235B A22B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.