The open-weight variant of Qwen3.8 Max, with 95 billion active parameters out of 2.4 trillion total.
Fast and efficient with near-frontier intelligence.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Claude Haiku 4.5 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a lower blended cost. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: $2.00 input / $6.00 output. Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has a larger context window: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B supports 1M tokens vs Claude Haiku 4.5 at 200K tokens.
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports vision/image input, but Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B does not.
Key differences: only Claude Haiku 4.5 supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Claude Haiku 4.5 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.