xAI's agentic build model for autonomous software engineering.
Meta's efficient 70B model matching Llama 3.1 405B on key benchmarks.
No shared demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Grok Build 0.1 and Llama 3.3 70B are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Llama 3.3 70B has a lower blended cost. Grok Build 0.1: $1.00 input / $2.00 output. Llama 3.3 70B: $0.13 input / $0.40 output.
Grok Build 0.1 has a larger context window: Grok Build 0.1 supports 256K tokens vs Llama 3.3 70B at 131K tokens.
Grok Build 0.1 supports vision/image input, but Llama 3.3 70B does not.
Key differences: Llama 3.3 70B is significantly cheaper; only Grok Build 0.1 supports vision input; only Grok Build 0.1 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Grok Build 0.1 and Llama 3.3 70B for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.