GLM 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic's fifth-generation Sonnet — near-Opus intelligence at Sonnet speed and price.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Frequently Asked Questions: GLM 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5▼
Which is better, GLM 4.6 or Claude Sonnet 5?
▼
Based on the Capability Index, Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher (80.1 vs 73.5). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.6 or Claude Sonnet 5?
▼
GLM 4.6 has a lower blended cost. GLM 4.6: $0.43 input / $1.74 output. Claude Sonnet 5: $3.00 input / $15.00 output.
Which has a larger context window, GLM 4.6 or Claude Sonnet 5?
▼
Claude Sonnet 5 has a larger context window: GLM 4.6 supports 203K tokens vs Claude Sonnet 5 at 1M tokens.
Do both GLM 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 5 support vision?
▼
Claude Sonnet 5 supports vision/image input, but GLM 4.6 does not.
What are the key differences between GLM 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 5?
▼
Key differences: Claude Sonnet 5 has a notably higher capability index (6.6 point gap); GLM 4.6 is significantly cheaper; only Claude Sonnet 5 supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.
Which model should I choose for my use case?
▼
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both GLM 4.6 and Claude Sonnet 5 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.