Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Muse Spark 1.1

At a glance

Claude 3.5 Sonnet — better-than-Opus capabilities at Sonnet speeds.

68#59/92

Meta's multimodal reasoning model built for agentic work and real-world coding.

1.0M ctx$1.25/$4.25 per M
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI67.5
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science55.3%Expert-Level4.1%
Math
Math Problems56.9%Competition Math8.5%Research Math2.1%
Coding
Code Editing51.6%
Agentic
Terminal Tasks—Task Horizon30min
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Provider·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-16
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—Expert-Level1179%52.2%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math—Research Math—
Coding
Code Editing—
Agentic
Terminal Tasks80.0%Task Horizon—
Specs
—
Context
—
Max output
—
Released
1.0M
Context
16K
Max output
Jul 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Pricing not available
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.25/M tokens
Output$4.25/M tokens
Cache read$0.15/M tokens
Web search$0.003/search
Chat with Claude 3.5 SonnetGo to model
Chat with Muse Spark 1.1Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Muse Spark 1.1▼

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Muse Spark 1.1?

▼

Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Muse Spark 1.1 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Do both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Muse Spark 1.1 support vision?

▼

Muse Spark 1.1 supports vision/image input, but Claude 3.5 Sonnet does not.

What are the key differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Muse Spark 1.1?

▼

Key differences: only Muse Spark 1.1 supports vision input; only Muse Spark 1.1 offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Muse Spark 1.1 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App