Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

At a glance

World-class coding model with sustained performance on complex agentic tasks.

75200K ctx$15.00/$75.00 per M#40/92

Alibaba's cost-efficient Qwen3.7 model for long-context multimodal work.

1M ctx$0.32/$1.28 per M
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI75.4
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science69.2%
Math
Math Problems85.0%Competition Math42.2%Research Math4.5%
Coding
Real-World Coding70.7%Code Editing70.7%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning1.3%
No benchmarks available

This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.

Specs
200K
Context
32K
Max output
May 2025
Released
1M
Context
66K
Max output
Jun 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$15.00/M tokens
Output$75.00/M tokens
Cache read$1.50/M tokens
Cache write$18.75/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input98%$0.32/M tokens
Output98%$1.28/M tokens
Cache read96%$0.06/M tokens
Cache write98%$0.40/M tokens
Chat with Claude Opus 4Go to model
Chat with Qwen3.7 PlusGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus▼

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

▼

Both Claude Opus 4 and Qwen3.7 Plus are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

▼

Qwen3.7 Plus has a lower blended cost. Claude Opus 4: $15.00 input / $75.00 output. Qwen3.7 Plus: $0.32 input / $1.28 output.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

▼

Qwen3.7 Plus has a larger context window: Claude Opus 4 supports 200K tokens vs Qwen3.7 Plus at 1M tokens.

Do both Claude Opus 4 and Qwen3.7 Plus support vision?

▼

Yes, both Claude Opus 4 and Qwen3.7 Plus support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Claude Opus 4 and Qwen3.7 Plus?

▼

Key differences: Qwen3.7 Plus is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Claude Opus 4 and Qwen3.7 Plus for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App