Baidu's large vision-language MoE model — 424B total, 47B active.
Google's high-efficiency model for coding, agentic workflows, and web and app development.
No shared agent demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.
Both ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B and Gemini 3.6 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B has a lower blended cost. ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B: $0.42 input / $1.25 output. Gemini 3.6 Flash: $1.50 input / $7.50 output.
Gemini 3.6 Flash has a larger context window: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B supports 123K tokens vs Gemini 3.6 Flash at 1M tokens.
Yes, both ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B and Gemini 3.6 Flash support vision/image input.
Key differences: ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B and Gemini 3.6 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.