Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

At a glance

Open-source reasoning model matching OpenAI o1 performance.

7264K ctx$0.70/$2.50 per M#51/92

Alibaba's cost-efficient Qwen3.7 model for long-context multimodal work.

1M ctx$0.32/$1.28 per M
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI72.4
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science69.2%
Math
Math Problems93.1%Competition Math53.3%
Coding
Code Editing56.9%
Agentic
Novel Reasoning1.3%Task Horizon27min
No benchmarks available

This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.

Specs
64K
Context
16K
Max output
Jan 2025
Released
1M
Context
66K
Max output
Jun 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.70/M tokens
Output$2.50/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input54%$0.32/M tokens
Output49%$1.28/M tokens
Cache read$0.06/M tokens
Cache write$0.40/M tokens
Chat with DeepSeek R1Go to model
Chat with Qwen3.7 PlusGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus▼

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

▼

Both DeepSeek R1 and Qwen3.7 Plus are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek R1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

▼

Qwen3.7 Plus has a lower blended cost. DeepSeek R1: $0.70 input / $2.50 output. Qwen3.7 Plus: $0.32 input / $1.28 output.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek R1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

▼

Qwen3.7 Plus has a larger context window: DeepSeek R1 supports 64K tokens vs Qwen3.7 Plus at 1M tokens.

Do both DeepSeek R1 and Qwen3.7 Plus support vision?

▼

Qwen3.7 Plus supports vision/image input, but DeepSeek R1 does not.

What are the key differences between DeepSeek R1 and Qwen3.7 Plus?

▼

Key differences: Qwen3.7 Plus is significantly cheaper; only Qwen3.7 Plus supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both DeepSeek R1 and Qwen3.7 Plus for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App